MP blasts delay in blueprint for housing growth

Malvern Gazette: MP blasts delay in blueprint for housing growth MP blasts delay in blueprint for housing growth

MALVERN’S MP has attacked delays in getting the county’s main growth b l u e p r i n t approved – saying the Second World War took less time to sort out.

During a passionate Westminster debate, Harriett Baldwin blasted the planning system as “byzantine” and said the county is being “strangled” by the delays.

The Conservative, who represents West Worcestershire, fears the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) holdup could run to the end of next year.

As the Malvern Gazette revealed last month, the document is being revised after an independent inspector said the proposed 23,000 homes are not enough.

Inspector Roger Clews wants councils in Worcester, Malvern and Wychavon, who jointly worked on the plan, to increase it by as much as 39 per cent.

Mrs Baldwin secured a debate on it at Westminster last Wednesday, and said the delays were costing money, harming the economy and were bad for democracy.

She said: “Frankly, World War Two took less time than the bureaucracy and red tape surrounding this local plan.

“And what is worse, all this bureaucracy and red tape is actually strangling housing growth in our area.

“Our desire is to see house building start according to a democratically agreed local plan.”

She said it was being held up due to a “difference of opinion”

over whether the 23,000 will be enough many years from now, despite all three councils agreeing to review the SWDP in 2019.

“We’re talking about a difference of opinion many years into the future, but it is not possible to have perfection,” she said.

“If we all had perfect foresight, we’d be able to retire as billionaires as we’d all know what the stock market prices would be.”

She also said councils were now “at the mercy” of developers submitting speculative planning applications which inspectors can overturn on appeal, labelling the system “byzantine”.

During the debate she called for any forthcoming appeals to be decided upon using the SWDP as an “emerging plan”, rather than ignore it, as is the current practice.

Her speech was backed by Worcester MP Robin Walker and Mid-Worcestershire’s Peter Luff, who also criticised the delays.

Mr Luff said: “It is crucial we get this plan approved as soon as possible. Speed is of the essence.”

The district councils are currently working on a fresh formula which will lead to a new, higher figure for the number of homes in the SWDP.

Mr Clews will then have to resume his examination, and will either ask for further changes or agree to give it the nod. The SWDP also earmarks land for 30,000 new jobs by 2030.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:44am Wed 4 Dec 13

Peter Huntington says...

As most of the additional housing wanted by Mr Clews will be taken by people who intend to commute via Junction 7 to Birmingham, Bristol, Gloucester or Cheltenham, the concept of housing need unrelated to the locality is bogus. The Planning Inspectorate is supposedly independent yet seems to take its cue from Government, who wish to use housing as an economic lever and **** the consequences for the countryside. It`s all very well for Mrs Baldwin to get agitated about the delays to the local plan but it`s her government that`s created the problem by allowing the potential hiatus between the existing local plans expiring and the new ones being agreed. The coalition was warned that this would happen when they created the "presumption in favour of sustainable development".-a bun fight for developers.
As most of the additional housing wanted by Mr Clews will be taken by people who intend to commute via Junction 7 to Birmingham, Bristol, Gloucester or Cheltenham, the concept of housing need unrelated to the locality is bogus. The Planning Inspectorate is supposedly independent yet seems to take its cue from Government, who wish to use housing as an economic lever and **** the consequences for the countryside. It`s all very well for Mrs Baldwin to get agitated about the delays to the local plan but it`s her government that`s created the problem by allowing the potential hiatus between the existing local plans expiring and the new ones being agreed. The coalition was warned that this would happen when they created the "presumption in favour of sustainable development".-a bun fight for developers. Peter Huntington

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree