Flood disaster (From Malvern Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting MG NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Flood disaster
1:00pm Wednesday 13th February 2013 in Letters
THERE can be no doubt now that the flood work in Upton has been a disaster for the town.
Yes, a few riverside properties were able to get insurance once the wall was built but the rest of the town and wider area is really suffering.
Water is now deeper in Hanley Road and East Waterside every time the river bursts its banks.
These recent repeated closures of Hanley Road make everyone think the town is shut. The whole project was planned and managed by PR people – engineers might have realised that if you restrict the water in the town it will just go somewhere else.
When locals told them that would happen, the response from the Environment Agency was insulting and patronising but the levels confirm the locals were right. The flood gates leak and need huge diesel pumps to keep the levels down – really, they should be removed along with the wall, but all the town can hope for is the level of the Hanley Road near Countrywide is raised and that work is done soon.
DAVID ENGLISH
Welland
Comments(3)
Nathan Barley
says...
6:59am Thu 14 Feb 13
Allan Whitehead
says...
10:56am Sun 17 Feb 13
Yes if you restrict water in one particular area then you will no doubt move a very similar problem to another area further down the flood plain.
When developers build properties on virgin land they deprive that are of valuable ground soakage of any waters that are sent from the heavens above. Whether it is in the form of rain, hail, or snow. Recently, snow covered most of the UK, this was on top of saturated land with little soakage.
If itinerants moved on to open land all stops a pulled out to remove them. In many areas’ Mounds of rumble have been placed around a vulnerable piece of open land to prevent illegal usage. Yet when it comes to protecting people’s property from storm and tempest, we only do it piecemeal. Currently the state pays out millions in unemployment benefits. Why can these persons under supervision be employed to build mounds of earth along strategic areas of riverbanks in an attempt to save some areas that are prevalent to flooding.
We can always find monies to aid others who have suffered some disaster or another.
Finance is always available for wars that really are not our problem. However, when it comes to our own survival. We do nothing but moan about the unemployed, and people who are on benefit. I did a spell in the forces when I was in full time employment. They called it National Service. Surely, we could have a similar idea using the unemployed to carry out flood defence work.
Hack says...
4:20pm Wed 13 Feb 13
The pumps are not to counter leaking gates, they take surface water from within the town that is unable to drain normally because of flooding and pump it back into the river.
If PR designed the defences they did a good job.
Flooding in the last session spiralled towards 2007 levels because of saturated ground, with snow and rain dumped on top. Spill over levels were bound to be higher. Without defences Hanley Road and the waterfront would have been closed and properties further blighted. Blight leads to a reduced visitor experience and would eventually lead to a blight umbrella.