LiveLive updates on today's flooding in Worcestershire (including Monday morning disruption information)

First published in News
Last updated
by , Group Deputy Editor

This live event has finished

Summary

  • RIVER levels are expected to peak in some places today, while in others they continue to rise.
  • The Environment Agency continues to issue warnings, while the Met Office has a yellow (be aware) warning of rain in place.
  • You are welcome to contribute to today's coverage.
  • Tweet me @JohnWilsonWN
  • Text 80360 WN News
  • Email news@worcesternews.co.uk
  • Or post on our wall at www.facebook.com/theworcesternews

Comments (37)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:32pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Bonzodog says...

As predicted yesterday, huge queues southbound down Bath Road ... Just avoid.
As predicted yesterday, huge queues southbound down Bath Road ... Just avoid. Bonzodog
  • Score: 0

12:38pm Sun 9 Feb 14

CHANDBRUSH says...

Road between Droitwich and Tibberton has flooded for the last 20years what does Council do puts up warning signs even in summer .Most of the ditches are filled in.
Road between Droitwich and Tibberton has flooded for the last 20years what does Council do puts up warning signs even in summer .Most of the ditches are filled in. CHANDBRUSH
  • Score: 1

12:46pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Pomygranit says...

Anyone from Severn Trent:
Can you get yourselves into gear, suspend the roadworks on BathRoad now, get someone out of their pit and do it.
Anyone from Severn Trent: Can you get yourselves into gear, suspend the roadworks on BathRoad now, get someone out of their pit and do it. Pomygranit
  • Score: 7

1:01pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Moltaire says...

Can the highways department, for once, introduce some common sense in to their operations and get all roadworks in Worcester suspended or altered to allow traffic to get around while the Worcester bridge is closed.

Worcester's road network is appalling managed at the best of times dur to por road design and traffic management by the numpties at County Hall, but today is absolute chaos. Surely they must have known the river level was going to rise so why didn't they do anything last night to mitigate the problem and give motorists enough notice and put emergency measures in to place prior to this morning. It seems the solution to everything by the highways department is put some signs out, that's all. Pull your fingers out guys and try and show us all that you're not continually useless.
Can the highways department, for once, introduce some common sense in to their operations and get all roadworks in Worcester suspended or altered to allow traffic to get around while the Worcester bridge is closed. Worcester's road network is appalling managed at the best of times dur to por road design and traffic management by the numpties at County Hall, but today is absolute chaos. Surely they must have known the river level was going to rise so why didn't they do anything last night to mitigate the problem and give motorists enough notice and put emergency measures in to place prior to this morning. It seems the solution to everything by the highways department is put some signs out, that's all. Pull your fingers out guys and try and show us all that you're not continually useless. Moltaire
  • Score: 6

1:21pm Sun 9 Feb 14

saucerer says...

I was in town this morning and total and utter chaos, thanks in no small part to the inadequacies (again!) of Worcestershire county council's highways department. From all the weather and EA reports, they must have know the level of the river was going to rise and affect some roads, so why on earth didn't they have any contingency plans in place yesterday evevning? They should have had signs out all around the city in good time saying Worcester bridge was closed, and even have signs on the outskirts of the city, so that anyone wanting to get from one side of the river to the other would had enough advance notice and could have found alternative routes rather than heading in to the city centre, adding to the traffic chaos. I mean, for example, a sign placed on the A449 southbound before Ombersely saying Worcester bridge closed could have meant that people could use Holt Fleet bridge if needed rather than going towards the city centre to only find out then that Worcester bridge is closed.

And the constant disruption caused by incessant roadworks has made matters worse. Why, again, didn't the highways engineers arrange for the roadworks, expecially those on main routes like Bath Road and Droiwtich Road, to be suspended last night?

Are our highways staff really that stupid? Their constant ineptitude makes Worcester such an appalling place to drive around at the best of times whiel also causing much frustration and distress amongst the public. This department needs a thorough shaking up.
I was in town this morning and total and utter chaos, thanks in no small part to the inadequacies (again!) of Worcestershire county council's highways department. From all the weather and EA reports, they must have know the level of the river was going to rise and affect some roads, so why on earth didn't they have any contingency plans in place yesterday evevning? They should have had signs out all around the city in good time saying Worcester bridge was closed, and even have signs on the outskirts of the city, so that anyone wanting to get from one side of the river to the other would had enough advance notice and could have found alternative routes rather than heading in to the city centre, adding to the traffic chaos. I mean, for example, a sign placed on the A449 southbound before Ombersely saying Worcester bridge closed could have meant that people could use Holt Fleet bridge if needed rather than going towards the city centre to only find out then that Worcester bridge is closed. And the constant disruption caused by incessant roadworks has made matters worse. Why, again, didn't the highways engineers arrange for the roadworks, expecially those on main routes like Bath Road and Droiwtich Road, to be suspended last night? Are our highways staff really that stupid? Their constant ineptitude makes Worcester such an appalling place to drive around at the best of times whiel also causing much frustration and distress amongst the public. This department needs a thorough shaking up. saucerer
  • Score: 3

1:24pm Sun 9 Feb 14

saucerer says...

Can we now expect the highways department to make a parody video about their roads being flooded, which affects the public, very much like their pothole video?
Can we now expect the highways department to make a parody video about their roads being flooded, which affects the public, very much like their pothole video? saucerer
  • Score: 0

1:25pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Doogie 46 says...

Yes, those traffic lights at the St Peters roundabout really are appreciated right now (I don`t think!!!) Not to mention the lights by St Peters Garden Centre cutting off more escape routes.
It would be great if they could be removed for a few days but I suspect too many unfilled holes have been created.
A bit of foresight isn`t too much to ask from our highly paid "experts" surely.
Yes, those traffic lights at the St Peters roundabout really are appreciated right now (I don`t think!!!) Not to mention the lights by St Peters Garden Centre cutting off more escape routes. It would be great if they could be removed for a few days but I suspect too many unfilled holes have been created. A bit of foresight isn`t too much to ask from our highly paid "experts" surely. Doogie 46
  • Score: 1

1:30pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Bonzodog says...

If this situation doesn't make the case for a new bridge north of the city ( with the completion of the ring road) I really don't know what does!
If this situation doesn't make the case for a new bridge north of the city ( with the completion of the ring road) I really don't know what does! Bonzodog
  • Score: 5

1:42pm Sun 9 Feb 14

gemma6 says...

Bonzodog wrote:
If this situation doesn't make the case for a new bridge north of the city ( with the completion of the ring road) I really don't know what does!
Absolutely! I wonder if Worcester is the only city with half a ring road?
[quote][p][bold]Bonzodog[/bold] wrote: If this situation doesn't make the case for a new bridge north of the city ( with the completion of the ring road) I really don't know what does![/p][/quote]Absolutely! I wonder if Worcester is the only city with half a ring road? gemma6
  • Score: 3

1:44pm Sun 9 Feb 14

brooksider says...

All the buffon Adrian Hardman can say is 'well it is the year of the horse'.
The Chairman of Worcestershire County Council showing again how out of touch he is.
No wonder he has problems attracting business into the area.
He should be getting of his considerable backside and sorting out the problems caused by his Highways Department.
All the buffon Adrian Hardman can say is 'well it is the year of the horse'. The Chairman of Worcestershire County Council showing again how out of touch he is. No wonder he has problems attracting business into the area. He should be getting of his considerable backside and sorting out the problems caused by his Highways Department. brooksider
  • Score: 3

1:46pm Sun 9 Feb 14

saucerer says...

Doogie 46 wrote:
Yes, those traffic lights at the St Peters roundabout really are appreciated right now (I don`t think!!!) Not to mention the lights by St Peters Garden Centre cutting off more escape routes.
It would be great if they could be removed for a few days but I suspect too many unfilled holes have been created.
A bit of foresight isn`t too much to ask from our highly paid "experts" surely.
The only thing these highway "experts" are good at are checking their large salaries and wondering what they can spend undeserved wages on. Just look at the head of the highways department and his £80k salary for example.
[quote][p][bold]Doogie 46[/bold] wrote: Yes, those traffic lights at the St Peters roundabout really are appreciated right now (I don`t think!!!) Not to mention the lights by St Peters Garden Centre cutting off more escape routes. It would be great if they could be removed for a few days but I suspect too many unfilled holes have been created. A bit of foresight isn`t too much to ask from our highly paid "experts" surely.[/p][/quote]The only thing these highway "experts" are good at are checking their large salaries and wondering what they can spend undeserved wages on. Just look at the head of the highways department and his £80k salary for example. saucerer
  • Score: 4

1:50pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

All the river gauges above Worcester are showing falling levels so this is probably the peak level with it levelling out and falling over the next few hours.

There's a good chance the bridge will be open again for Monday.
All the river gauges above Worcester are showing falling levels so this is probably the peak level with it levelling out and falling over the next few hours. There's a good chance the bridge will be open again for Monday. Hwicce
  • Score: 1

2:06pm Sun 9 Feb 14

WilkoJ says...

There was only so much the EA could do to prevent the effects of the flooded river on to nearby roads in Worcester city centre. But there was so much which the highways department could have done to reduce the utter chaos caused on the city's road network as a result of the floods and road closures. How could they have such a total lack of foresight and common sense not to recognise that roads would inevitably be flooded and not to have emergency measures in place in good time? As one on the above comments said, are they really that stupid?

Their constant incompetence not only holds Worcester to ransom, but it makes the city a no go area for motorists, more so on days like this. How much longer do the residents of Worcestershire have to suffer from their ineptitude?
There was only so much the EA could do to prevent the effects of the flooded river on to nearby roads in Worcester city centre. But there was so much which the highways department could have done to reduce the utter chaos caused on the city's road network as a result of the floods and road closures. How could they have such a total lack of foresight and common sense not to recognise that roads would inevitably be flooded and not to have emergency measures in place in good time? As one on the above comments said, are they really that stupid? Their constant incompetence not only holds Worcester to ransom, but it makes the city a no go area for motorists, more so on days like this. How much longer do the residents of Worcestershire have to suffer from their ineptitude? WilkoJ
  • Score: 2

2:31pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Sasha888 says...

Hello!
Does anybody know if Worcester City Bridge is open to Pedestrians? I really need to get to St Johns from the centre and don't fancy swimming.

Thanks in advance x
Hello! Does anybody know if Worcester City Bridge is open to Pedestrians? I really need to get to St Johns from the centre and don't fancy swimming. Thanks in advance x Sasha888
  • Score: 0

3:18pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

Sasha888 wrote:
Hello!
Does anybody know if Worcester City Bridge is open to Pedestrians? I really need to get to St Johns from the centre and don't fancy swimming.

Thanks in advance x
Yes it is, just been over it.

There isn't any flooding down Bridge Street or New Road so they could have left the bridge open outbound.

The flooding is by the old pump house (Hylton Road side) and between the Rectifying House and the Severn View Hotel. Even that can easily be walked past.
[quote][p][bold]Sasha888[/bold] wrote: Hello! Does anybody know if Worcester City Bridge is open to Pedestrians? I really need to get to St Johns from the centre and don't fancy swimming. Thanks in advance x[/p][/quote]Yes it is, just been over it. There isn't any flooding down Bridge Street or New Road so they could have left the bridge open outbound. The flooding is by the old pump house (Hylton Road side) and between the Rectifying House and the Severn View Hotel. Even that can easily be walked past. Hwicce
  • Score: 4

3:36pm Sun 9 Feb 14

rackedoff says...

WilkoJ says it very well. The County Council should absolutely have had the foresight to be prepared for what was obviously going to happen, and to have had contingency plans for keeping the traffic flowing. But it's not just about posting (inadequate) diversion signs in (obscure) places. It's about recognising that there are other issues around Worcester like the road works on St Peters roundabout, that are exacerbating the problem. Simply tell them to cover their holes in the road, remove their traffic lights and get things moving.
WilkoJ says it very well. The County Council should absolutely have had the foresight to be prepared for what was obviously going to happen, and to have had contingency plans for keeping the traffic flowing. But it's not just about posting (inadequate) diversion signs in (obscure) places. It's about recognising that there are other issues around Worcester like the road works on St Peters roundabout, that are exacerbating the problem. Simply tell them to cover their holes in the road, remove their traffic lights and get things moving. rackedoff
  • Score: -1

3:43pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Pomygranit says...

Does anyone know what is happening with buses tomorrow into Worcester from Dines Green & Henwick Park? Is there going to be a shuttle service and walk over the bridge. I know First do not work Sundays but some information would be useful. I know the pictures are interesting but some practical information would be useful.
Can you walk into the city at the moment?
Does anyone know what is happening with buses tomorrow into Worcester from Dines Green & Henwick Park? Is there going to be a shuttle service and walk over the bridge. I know First do not work Sundays but some information would be useful. I know the pictures are interesting but some practical information would be useful. Can you walk into the city at the moment? Pomygranit
  • Score: 1

4:08pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Saturn V says...

Here's a tip. Go and oil your bicycle chain and make sure the tyres are pumped up nice and hard
If you live outside Worcester, chuck it in the back of your car now so you can park a few miles outside Worcester and breeze in past all the traffic.
Or work out how long it'll take to walk and see if it's quicker than driving.

This will help keep the roads clearer for buses, taxis, delivery vehicles, the emergency services, the disabled, traffic trying to get through/around Worcester.
Or you can sit in your car for hours blaming everyone else for the traffic.
Here's a tip. Go and oil your bicycle chain and make sure the tyres are pumped up nice and hard If you live outside Worcester, chuck it in the back of your car now so you can park a few miles outside Worcester and breeze in past all the traffic. Or work out how long it'll take to walk and see if it's quicker than driving. This will help keep the roads clearer for buses, taxis, delivery vehicles, the emergency services, the disabled, traffic trying to get through/around Worcester. Or you can sit in your car for hours blaming everyone else for the traffic. Saturn V
  • Score: 7

4:36pm Sun 9 Feb 14

honeystj says...

If New Road and Bridge St are open and dry, WHY is the town bridge shut?
Both roads could easily be made into two-direction roads for cars, buses, vans only and at least some traffic could get through.
Tomorrow will be chaos for drivers.
If New Road and Bridge St are open and dry, WHY is the town bridge shut? Both roads could easily be made into two-direction roads for cars, buses, vans only and at least some traffic could get through. Tomorrow will be chaos for drivers. honeystj
  • Score: 2

4:39pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it.

The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge.

The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc.

There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.
I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it. The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge. The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc. There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction. Hwicce
  • Score: 7

4:46pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Consist on says...

For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!! Consist on
  • Score: -2

4:55pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Consist on says...

Hwicce wrote:
I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it.

The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge.

The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc.

There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.
Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote: I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it. The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge. The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc. There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.[/p][/quote]Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!! Consist on
  • Score: -3

5:21pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

Consist on wrote:
Hwicce wrote:
I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it.

The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge.

The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc.

There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.
Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!!
Yes I have actually.

If there is so much thought in it why is the outbound route closed? There is not a drop of water on it (as you are the expert).
[quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote: I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it. The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge. The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc. There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.[/p][/quote]Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!![/p][/quote]Yes I have actually. If there is so much thought in it why is the outbound route closed? There is not a drop of water on it (as you are the expert). Hwicce
  • Score: 14

5:49pm Sun 9 Feb 14

honeystj says...

Consist on wrote:
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
I'm sure your husband and his colleagues have been working extremely hard for many, many hours. And he's probably been doing it for years - which makes me surprised you should take others' opinions here so personally.
And if people question the logistics, why is it because they're "only thinking about" themselves? Personally, I shall be cycling to work this week as always, but I really, really feel sorry for those who will have to deal with this and the inconveniences. Is that ok?
[quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!![/p][/quote]I'm sure your husband and his colleagues have been working extremely hard for many, many hours. And he's probably been doing it for years - which makes me surprised you should take others' opinions here so personally. And if people question the logistics, why is it because they're "only thinking about" themselves? Personally, I shall be cycling to work this week as always, but I really, really feel sorry for those who will have to deal with this and the inconveniences. Is that ok? honeystj
  • Score: 3

6:03pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Consist on says...

Hwicce wrote:
Consist on wrote:
Hwicce wrote:
I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it.

The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge.

The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc.

There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.
Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!!
Yes I have actually.

If there is so much thought in it why is the outbound route closed? There is not a drop of water on it (as you are the expert).
Actually as we speak it is now running through the park and onto new road as the river is rising !!!!
[quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote: I have to query the decision to close the bridge at all. It would be interesting to know the rationale behind it. The outbound route - Deansway, Bridge Street, New Road is totally dry so there is no reason to close it. Traffic that would have come down Castle Street could have gone round via City Walls Road and then on to Deansway. It would have been longer but not as long as going out to Carrington Bridge. The inbound route has surface flooding but the crown of the road on both side is only a few inches deep and was passable. All that was required was for cones to be used to bring Tybridge Street down to one lane before the junction and then funnel the traffic along the crown of the road. The same could have been done just past the Rectifying House. That way the road could have stayed open even if it is just for buses, taxis, emergency vehicles etc. There doesn't seem to have been much thought involved more a knee-jerk reaction.[/p][/quote]Have you looked down by the Rectifying House ?!!!! The water is still rising!!! Are you going to be the one that goes to pull cars out of flooded water when they drive down there at night !!!! Lots of thought has been put into this and experience, but hey suddenly everyone's an expert!!!![/p][/quote]Yes I have actually. If there is so much thought in it why is the outbound route closed? There is not a drop of water on it (as you are the expert).[/p][/quote]Actually as we speak it is now running through the park and onto new road as the river is rising !!!! Consist on
  • Score: 0

6:08pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Consist on says...

honeystj wrote:
Consist on wrote:
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
I'm sure your husband and his colleagues have been working extremely hard for many, many hours. And he's probably been doing it for years - which makes me surprised you should take others' opinions here so personally.
And if people question the logistics, why is it because they're "only thinking about" themselves? Personally, I shall be cycling to work this week as always, but I really, really feel sorry for those who will have to deal with this and the inconveniences. Is that ok?
Yes that's fine but if you are cycling through flood water, watch out for raised manhole covers which flood water can push up!!! And yes he has done this for years and has to put up with the flack, he and his team work very hard in impossible circumstances yet people want to put the blame at their feet, that's why I take it so personally!
[quote][p][bold]honeystj[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!![/p][/quote]I'm sure your husband and his colleagues have been working extremely hard for many, many hours. And he's probably been doing it for years - which makes me surprised you should take others' opinions here so personally. And if people question the logistics, why is it because they're "only thinking about" themselves? Personally, I shall be cycling to work this week as always, but I really, really feel sorry for those who will have to deal with this and the inconveniences. Is that ok?[/p][/quote]Yes that's fine but if you are cycling through flood water, watch out for raised manhole covers which flood water can push up!!! And yes he has done this for years and has to put up with the flack, he and his team work very hard in impossible circumstances yet people want to put the blame at their feet, that's why I take it so personally! Consist on
  • Score: 2

6:39pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Doogie 46 says...

Credit where credit is due - the lights at the St Peters roundabout have been temporarily removed, so we should give a massive "THANK YOU" to the person who took that decision. Bath Road is at this moment almost clear, although it`s still very heavy and slow moving on the southern ring road.
Just thought I should mention it as we`ve all been castigating the Highways Dept and Severn Trent all afternoon.
Credit where credit is due - the lights at the St Peters roundabout have been temporarily removed, so we should give a massive "THANK YOU" to the person who took that decision. Bath Road is at this moment almost clear, although it`s still very heavy and slow moving on the southern ring road. Just thought I should mention it as we`ve all been castigating the Highways Dept and Severn Trent all afternoon. Doogie 46
  • Score: 6

7:36pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Redhillman says...

Consist on wrote:
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff.

If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures.

And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos.
[quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!![/p][/quote]There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff. If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures. And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos. Redhillman
  • Score: 3

7:49pm Sun 9 Feb 14

DEMRICS says...

Redhillman wrote:
Consist on wrote:
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff.

If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures.

And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos.
Very well summarised Redhillman and totally correct.
[quote][p][bold]Redhillman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!![/p][/quote]There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff. If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures. And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos.[/p][/quote]Very well summarised Redhillman and totally correct. DEMRICS
  • Score: 1

8:35pm Sun 9 Feb 14

kidderlord says...

Instaed of moaning at the Highways Dept, who are out there working their butts of with the EA and Police, why don't you all have a go at the budding David Bailey's who have added to the traffic chaos by just going sightseeing. I bet three quarters of the traffic would be gone if people used common sense. Hope it makes you all feel better gawping at other peoples downfall.
Instaed of moaning at the Highways Dept, who are out there working their butts of with the EA and Police, why don't you all have a go at the budding David Bailey's who have added to the traffic chaos by just going sightseeing. I bet three quarters of the traffic would be gone if people used common sense. Hope it makes you all feel better gawping at other peoples downfall. kidderlord
  • Score: 0

8:44pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Herefordian says...

Any reports of flooding on the A44 Bromyard to Worcester road?
Any reports of flooding on the A44 Bromyard to Worcester road? Herefordian
  • Score: -1

9:10pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Consist on says...

DEMRICS wrote:
Redhillman wrote:
Consist on wrote:
For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!!
There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff.

If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures.

And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos.
Very well summarised Redhillman and totally correct.
I do not work for the council!!! If people would have kept off the road instead of coming out site seeing , there would not have been so many people on the road to cause the hold ups. Like I said before the roads are closed as a last resort for the safety of all the residents , some people do have to be out and about, doctors, nurses etc., there will never be a good time, if they close it early they are criticised, if they try and keep them open as long as is humanly possible they are criticised, there in a no win situation. Just get off their backs and try supporting them instead moaning about them. They have to make decisions involving many agencies, it all takes time.
[quote][p][bold]DEMRICS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Redhillman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Consist on[/bold] wrote: For goodness sake all you experts get off the back of the highways. If they had shut the roads last night, that would have been wrong! They can never win. You are only interested in 'you' . Try looking at the bigger picture. . It's not as easy as you all seem to think. You only see what effects you!! Before they can close roads which they do as a last resort, to keep people safe, they have to check with police, fire and ambulance etc., they get information from the environment agency and work with them. There will always be disruption, they can't physically stop the rain falling from the sky, but I expect that's their fault too!!!! If most people used there common sense they would have stayed in this morning knowing from weather forecasts it was going to get worse and that roads would possibly have to close, , then there wouldn't have been so much traffic on the road in the first place!!! I along with lots and other wives, families etc have not seen my husband since the early hours he's been working trying to keep people moving, unfortunately he is not god so can't hold back the waters, but my god they have worked hard all day, just back off, !!!![/p][/quote]There were adequate warnings the night before from both the EA and the Met Office that the level of the River Severn would rise further, to a degree which would cause roads to flood this morning. So the question people are asking is why weren't the highways department prepared and implement an adequate contingency plan in good time rather than fire fight at the last minute as what they done today, causing utter mayhem and gridlock in Worcester? No-one is thinking about 'themselves' or criticing the rain, they're commenting on the effects of the total lack of foresight and planning by the highways department. This could be handled in a much more efficient manner, and when you're talking about emergency services, can you imagime how impaired their journeys must have been during the chaos that was caused today? Chaos that was caused by highways staff. If the highways department were felt to be competent, then there'd be little criticism of their activities, but when you look at their track record of incompetence and failings, I think the tax payer has every right to question their abilities. After all, look at Abbey Bridge, the Whittington roundabout, Newtown Road bus lane, rising bollards, wrong colour paint, wrong type of chippings etc, need I go on? Not exactly a pristine track record is it and this latest example of mismanagement during the floods just adds to the list failures. And for you to use some spin and actually have the audacity to blame residents for getting out and about and causing the chaos is frankly shocking, but then that seems like a typical comment you'd expect from the council. The next time you need to go somewhere, perhaps somewhere urgently or neccesary, I trust you will bite your tongue when you're caught up in chaos.[/p][/quote]Very well summarised Redhillman and totally correct.[/p][/quote]I do not work for the council!!! If people would have kept off the road instead of coming out site seeing , there would not have been so many people on the road to cause the hold ups. Like I said before the roads are closed as a last resort for the safety of all the residents , some people do have to be out and about, doctors, nurses etc., there will never be a good time, if they close it early they are criticised, if they try and keep them open as long as is humanly possible they are criticised, there in a no win situation. Just get off their backs and try supporting them instead moaning about them. They have to make decisions involving many agencies, it all takes time. Consist on
  • Score: 0

11:14pm Sun 9 Feb 14

DarrenM says...

Judging by the amount of photos popping up on "social media" it would appear some people have never seen water before.
No wonder the city was gridlocked it was probably due to all these people trying to get to Quay Street for a photo - They probably look up every time an Aeroplane goes overhead as well :)
Judging by the amount of photos popping up on "social media" it would appear some people have never seen water before. No wonder the city was gridlocked it was probably due to all these people trying to get to Quay Street for a photo - They probably look up every time an Aeroplane goes overhead as well :) DarrenM
  • Score: -2

3:49am Mon 10 Feb 14

yamoto says...

so does this not add to needing the northern link road, more than ever now ?
so does this not add to needing the northern link road, more than ever now ? yamoto
  • Score: 2

6:39am Mon 10 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

The River has dropped 5cm overnight. I wonder how long it will take the powers that be to realise.
The River has dropped 5cm overnight. I wonder how long it will take the powers that be to realise. Hwicce
  • Score: -4

7:41am Mon 10 Feb 14

Andy-Apache says...

One cure for this problem is to build 70,000 unnecessary houses on natural soakaway. I'm sure the millions of tonnes of tarmac and concrete pumped into the soil will help immeasurably...
One cure for this problem is to build 70,000 unnecessary houses on natural soakaway. I'm sure the millions of tonnes of tarmac and concrete pumped into the soil will help immeasurably... Andy-Apache
  • Score: 0

8:30am Mon 10 Feb 14

Hwicce says...

Hwicce wrote:
The River has dropped 5cm overnight. I wonder how long it will take the powers that be to realise.
Down 6cm now, also reports of a 4inch drop at Bevere.

Is there any water on New Road any more or is it only closed because "They have to make decisions involving many agencies, it all takes time"?

I listened to some twit from County Highways on the radio this morning who didn't seem capable of making a decision to save his life. That seems to be the problem these days we have so many "Heads Of" that they have to have a committee meeting to decide anything.

Simple question - if New Road is dry and the river level is falling why is the outbound route not open?
[quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote: The River has dropped 5cm overnight. I wonder how long it will take the powers that be to realise.[/p][/quote]Down 6cm now, also reports of a 4inch drop at Bevere. Is there any water on New Road any more or is it only closed because "They have to make decisions involving many agencies, it all takes time"? I listened to some twit from County Highways on the radio this morning who didn't seem capable of making a decision to save his life. That seems to be the problem these days we have so many "Heads Of" that they have to have a committee meeting to decide anything. Simple question - if New Road is dry and the river level is falling why is the outbound route not open? Hwicce
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree