Council defends ‘contracting out’

Council defends ‘contracting out’ Council defends ‘contracting out’

ORGANISATIONS in Worcestershire stand to benefit the most from controversial plans to farm out council services, bosses have said.

The county council says it will make every effort to ensure it carries on spending most of its cash locally after figures revealed 77 per cent of the authority’s £330 million yearly spend stays in Worcestershire.

County Hall has plans to shrink 40 per cent by 2017 by handing over services to external providers.

It says most contracts up for grabs will be handed to county organisations, keeping as much cash as possible in Worces- tershire.

The move, as your Worcester News first reported in January, includes 650 new job losses on top of the 856 already being scrapped. Councillor Adrian Hardman, speaking during a meeting of the Conservative cabinet, said: “We are looking to reduce our spend by around £20 million a year, partly as a result of increasing demands on certain services and partly because we’re expecting to receive less funding from central Government.

“Work is well underway to plan ahead for the future years in many areas, including reducing our assets and partnership working.”

A new report, which was backed by the cabinet, says “local suppliers” will also be encouraged to take on more work so less of it is done in-house. Bosses also want to make better use of the authority’s internet site, so more people use it to access services, rather than ringing up or writing in.

They believe many of the 650 jobs lost due to the ‘commissioning’ process can be tak- en over and provided by whichever organisations take on services.

The hope is that by transferring staff over to new providers, less people will end up on the scrapheap.

Coun David Thain, the cabinet member for transformation and change, said: “The important thing this demonstrates is that we are fiscally responsible, which means we have not needed to put up council tax this year.

“We are proud of our financial approach.”

Comments(4)

old misery says...
12:22pm Wed 13 Mar 13

Whats the chances of CEO and other top jobs being subcontracted out???

green49 says...
8:31pm Wed 13 Mar 13

What a load of b******* this is, be careful what you wish for as the people deciding on these changes have no idea what they are doing, they will be losing so much expertise and the Private sector will rip the taxpayer off with bad services as they are now, as already has happened, some good people have been dispatched to the scrap heap from the council and the wasters who are still at the council are there grossly overpaid and under worked.

Landy44 says...
10:22pm Wed 13 Mar 13

If this genuinely means local government shrinking by 40% then it's a start. They need to shrink by 80% overall to get to something appropriate.

They also need a mechanism so we can throw put poor performing providers at least annually.

Done properly this could be great....but I suspect it won't be done properly.

green49 says...
2:02pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Getting rid of poor private providers when everything else from the council has gone will be a disaster waiting to happen, i deal in this sector as i said before beware what you wish for!!!!!!!
Once its gone that's it, it is already in a huge mess due to incompetance and no proper understanding of how things work by the ones cutting back the fiance,

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree