Wheelie bin plan still under attack

Wheelie bin plan still under attack Wheelie bin plan still under attack

THE controversial decision to introduce wheelie bins into Malvern is under attack from all sides ahead of a crunch meeting next week.

Malvern Hills District Council has to date spent about £1.2million of a government grant purchasing wheelie bins and making adjustments to its fleet of lorries.

However the scheme is coming under pressure and one member of the council has suggested the project could be aborted and the council forced to sell its stock of bins.

Coun Anthony Warburton, a member of the controlling Tory group, believes the project has been led by unelected officers and councillors have never given it the goahead. On Tuesday, he will table a motion to full council demanding councillors are given the facts and a chance to decide on the scheme.

Pressure is also coming from Malvern Town Council, which this week passed a motion urging the district council to give wheelie bins more discussion. Members are also requesting district council officers attend Malvern’s town meeting on March 19 to “explain in full their decision”.

Coun Clive Smith, who sits on both councils, said: “If we (the district council) decide not to go ahead with it then we would have to rip off our logos and sell the bins to some poor council foolish enough to go ahead.”

Malvern’s MP Harriett Baldwin has written to district council leader David Hughes on behalf of town councillor Mike Charles, who says he has been “inundated” with complaints from residents about wheelie bins.

She told Coun Charles she had asked Coun Hughes to “fully investigate” the situation.

Coun Hughes said he has replied to Mrs Baldwin, explaining the council has received £1.6 million government funding to help preserve weekly black bag collections for general waste – and this is reliant on the introduction of wheelie bins for recyclables.

He also disputed the notion councillors had not had a say.

“This has been the subject of two member workshops, a policy group and two separate motions at full council, supporting the bid and the implementation,” he said.

“At meetings, in December and in September, the issue of our bid to government to preserve the weekly black bag collection and introduce wheelie bins for recycling was discussed in some detail,”

he said. “It is disappointing that they are only now raising their concerns over the decision.”

Comments(10)

sarah and her chickens says...
12:33pm Fri 15 Feb 13

No doubt Hughes will place a whip on the tories to stop this motion being passed.
The motion calls for a debate and a through examination of how the money is being spent. So that both the public and councilors are fully aware of what is happening.
For him to stop an open debate on this topic makes me question just what is he hiding. If all the figures add up, the survey stands up too testing then how can a debate in council be a bad thing.
What happened to democracy and transparency in our elected councillors.
So far all we have had is our officers alluding to the loss of weekly collections with no figures to back this up. A through debate on the topic is needed.

IsayIsayIsay says...
12:58pm Fri 15 Feb 13

While the councillors all sit and argue about bins ...and get paid for it... is there any chance I might have my bin a bit sooner so I can recycle my glass....?

sarah and her chickens says...
1:39pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Thing is isayisayisay your glass wil not be recycled if you put it in the wheelie bin.You might as well just chuck it in the black bags.Commingeled glass just goes for road fill.
The EU are currently investigating if this form of" recycling" is even legal, so they may have to bin the wheelie bins anyway !!

IsayIsayIsay says...
11:04pm Fri 15 Feb 13

If this is true and the glass goes into improving our roads...the more glass we put in the recycling bins the better our roads will be....... this make me want my bin even sooner - heaven knows there are enough potholes that need filling!

sarah and her chickens says...
8:51am Sat 16 Feb 13

yes the road do need improving , but the whole idea about recycling is to save energy and resources. All the glass that goes into road fill is lost forever. Just as if it went to landfill. If recycled properly it can be used again and again and again !! Otherwise w are not helping anyone or anything. Just getting MHDCs recycling rates up but not actually recycling anything.

Olley Owl Owd Betts Barn says...
10:44am Sat 16 Feb 13

Why are we having Malvern’s MP Harriett Baldwin, poking her nose in on the subject her government have given money to Malvern Hills District Council. What she should be investigating is the comments of Councillor Anthony Warburton. If elected member have not authorised the use of this Government grant. If Officers have taken decisions that have not been delegated to Officer, or to Officers and Chair, of the appropriate committee. It will be a blatant misuse of public funds.

According, experience, and comment of various refuse disposal personnel, the use of wheelie bins is one of the safest ways of refuse collection, and are supported by the Health & Safety Executive.
Further, if we are to believe our world scientist that our natural resources need to be recycled in an attempt to preserve our planet. Recycling is necessary and landfill reduced to a minimum. Pollution, Recycling, and Alternative Energy have been a somewhat high priority of the United Kingdom.
However, while we try to conserve by recycling other Countries seem to be ignoring the seriousness of the problem.
In addition before any system is to be introduced meaningful discussion should have taken place with all parties concerned in an attempt set all those problems that people consider to be a hindrance to implementation are resolved then in my personal opinion no action should have taken place to introduce this refuse bin scheme.

Windy Miller says...
6:48pm Sat 16 Feb 13

Wheelie bins roll, ideal for the Malvern Hills vandals.

sarah and her chickens says...
8:49pm Sat 16 Feb 13

They float too , so could make good transport if it keeps raining!!

IsayIsayIsay says...
10:52pm Sun 17 Feb 13

"two separate motions at full council support the bid"

Perhaps I'm missing something but it seems to me that everyone got chance to pipe up, and those that didn't take their chance when it was offered should pipe down. The real 'waste' issue is the waste of time arguing surely the time around the table would be better spent talking about housing and ways to increase economic prosperity?

sarah and her chickens says...
9:41am Mon 18 Feb 13

This bid could cost us taxpayers £300 000 a year more than if we remain as we are. Figures were never fully discussed or released to councillors, no one even knows how much over spend three could be. Before this goes ahead it needs to be aired in public.
How can any council agree to spend so much more money when s you say they should be focusing on the economy not spending several million on a few glass jars

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree