Joy for needy as the shelves fill with food (From Malvern Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting MG NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Joy for needy as the shelves fill with food
6:20pm Saturday 26th January 2013 in News By Tarik Al Rasheed
HELPING HAND: Steve Geal with some of the donated food that is being stored at Malvern’s new foodbank.
STORAGE shelves are heaving after Malvern’s new foodbank opened.
Having leapt into operation to provide emergency food to families in need over the Christmas holidays, the new charity has formally opened this week.
Over the past few weeks donations have enabled it to build up a stockpile of almost 1.5 tonnes of food – although chairman David Wareing said this will need constant replenishing and has no idea how quickly stocks will run out.
The charity, set up in partnership with the Trussell Trust, has also amassed a small army of about 70 volunteers who have now been trained to help sort and distribute the food.
The foodbank, on Howsell Industrial Estate, Malvern Link, will initially be opening its doors twice a week, on Monday and Thursday mornings. Volunteers will prepare food parcels between 9am and 11am and then distribute them to referred clients between 11am and 1pm.
Those referrals will come from a wide range of agencies, including Sunshine and Evergreen children’s centres in Malvern, Hope Unlimited, Christians Against Poverty and the Citizens Advice Bureau. Mr Wareing said more referral agencies would be added as the foodbank gets up and running and there is a better idea of overall need and demand.
He said: “Opening days will also be added depending upon demand and as we get volunteers trained up. We are also putting in place a system for providing emergency parcels outside of these hours.”
Comments(8)
pronstar
says...
10:11pm Sat 26 Jan 13
chapski75
says...
11:20am Sun 27 Jan 13
pronstar wrote:It has to be complicated. If the charity gave food out to just anyone then it will be abused, and then it will lose credibility and not receive donations.
It all sounds very complicated
Look at the benefits system and the number of cases we see of that being abused, if there's something going for free then it attracts the wrong sort of people and not just those in desperate need.
induby
says...
1:08pm Sun 27 Jan 13
pronstar
says...
4:00pm Sun 27 Jan 13
chapski75 wrote:From the DWP web site: -
pronstar wrote:It has to be complicated. If the charity gave food out to just anyone then it will be abused, and then it will lose credibility and not receive donations.
It all sounds very complicated
Look at the benefits system and the number of cases we see of that being abused, if there's something going for free then it attracts the wrong sort of people and not just those in desperate need.
"For 2011/12 it is estimated that 2.1 per cent of total benefit expenditure was overpaid due to fraud and error, the same as the 2010/11 estimate.
For 2011/12, it is estimated that 0.8 per cent of total benefit expenditure was underpaid due to fraud and error, the same as the 2010/11 estimate."
So if we apply your comparison then not very much of the food would end up in the wrong hands.
I just don't think it's right that when people are reduced to living off food hand-outs they are then forced to jump through hoops to get it.
chapski75
says...
9:58pm Sun 27 Jan 13
pronstar wrote:Statistics are one thing but when you're talking about half of the treasury spending on benefits then even 0.8 per cent is a ridiculously large number. Also "fraud and error" is not the same as "morally justified" or "acceptable to tax payers". We've all seen the headlines of some people living a much better life on benefits than many people in work.
chapski75 wrote:From the DWP web site: -
pronstar wrote:It has to be complicated. If the charity gave food out to just anyone then it will be abused, and then it will lose credibility and not receive donations.
It all sounds very complicated
Look at the benefits system and the number of cases we see of that being abused, if there's something going for free then it attracts the wrong sort of people and not just those in desperate need.
"For 2011/12 it is estimated that 2.1 per cent of total benefit expenditure was overpaid due to fraud and error, the same as the 2010/11 estimate.
For 2011/12, it is estimated that 0.8 per cent of total benefit expenditure was underpaid due to fraud and error, the same as the 2010/11 estimate."
So if we apply your comparison then not very much of the food would end up in the wrong hands.
I just don't think it's right that when people are reduced to living off food hand-outs they are then forced to jump through hoops to get it.
If there were a case of someone who could easily afford their own food getting free handouts that will make the headlines and be damaging to the charity's good work.
They'll balance the risk with the impact to the claimant. I'm sure the claimant would rather that than be turned away as they'd ran out. They then open the paper to see man in 4 bedroom detached house, with BMW on the drive, gets food handouts!
DWP makes people jump through hoops and there are plenty of artists out there manipulating the system.
pronstar
says...
9:15am Mon 28 Jan 13
Andy-Apache
says...
12:47pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Really?...
pronstar
says...
9:40pm Mon 28 Jan 13
I was merely pointing out that benefit fraud was relatively low when it was used to compare possible wrongful claims on this charity.
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with