I can’t see U-turn over housing plan – Malvern leader (From Malvern Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting MG NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
I can’t see U-turn over housing plan – Malvern leader
1:00pm Friday 16th November 2012 in News By Tarik Al Rasheed
I can’t see U-turn over housing plan – Malvern leader
HOPES that Malvern Hills politicians will perform a U-turn and save a housing masterplan for south Worcestershire have been dismissed by their leader.
Malvern Hills District Council (MHDC) stunned its partners Worcester City and Wychavon on Tuesday evening by voting to send the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) back to the drawing board.
Yesterday both Worcester and Wychavon spoke of a faint hope the SWDP could be saved when the three councils go to simultaneous votes on December 10.
Simon Geraghty, Worcester City Council leader, said: “I hope over the last couple of days it has got into people’s minds what position we would be in without a plan.
“We have to be clear this is the second chance, and after that there is no chance. It is this plan or no plan, so although the indications are far from good you don’t know what could happen.”
But MHDC leader David Hughes, fresh out of an all-day meeting of the Joint Advisory Panel (JAP) overseeing the development plan, said that was unrealistic.
“I cannot see that the SWDP will come before the council again as stands,” he said.
“That would contradict the motions passed this week and if it did come in that form it would undoubtedly by rejected.”
Calling the JAP meeting “quite constructive under the circumstances”, he said members had been finalising all the main SWDP policies and “non-contentious” housing allocations.
Everything agreed and endorsed by JAP will be “put on the shelf” for use as and when needed by the councils for their own plans.
Investigation of alternative housing allocations in Malvern Hills will start early next week.
This process means Coun Hughes cannot guarantee Malvern’s plan will be ready for submission before March, when councils without a recognised plan will be at the mercy of the new National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
That concerns West Worcestershire MP Harriett Baldwin, whose constituency takes in both Malvern Hills and Wychavon.
“I think it is an extremely high risk decision that has been taken (by Malvern Hills),” she said. “I champion localism and believe local people should decide where the best sites are for housing.
“But I think it would be irresponsible of our councillors to fail to deliver any plan by March.
“Otherwise there is a very strong chance of developers getting planning permission in places we really don’t want them to. I completely understand why Wychavon feels that it needs to produce its own plan.”
Coun Hughes, meanwhile, insists he remains the man to lead MHDC.
“I think what I have done with the plan up until now has been absolutely right. I am now being instructed by the council to take on board their additional recommendations.
“That is what I shall do and I shall do it with the minimum of collateral damage.”
Comments(7)
Andy-Apache
says...
2:58pm Fri 16 Nov 12
This is about shedding populace from cities. I honestly cannot see any requirement for thousands of new homes in Malvern, and don't understand why, if there is a shortage of housing somewhere else, why Malvern should have to pay for it with loss of green space. It's a very communist outlook to suggest that because cities are full, everywhere else should be ruined to the same level.
This is beside the point that there is no new employment in Malvern, so the new influx (aside from those who don't understand the concept of birth control and now need a free house) will need to travel - probably to Worcester and the M5 via the already overburdened A4440 to get to their place of work.
To those who say the developers will build industrial parks too, and improve the road network, I say you're deluded. Look at Malvern Vale, and the promised business park which has now quietly been dropped in favour of more profitable housing.
chrism
says...
3:35pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Casmal
says...
4:55pm Fri 16 Nov 12
skychip
says...
7:57pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Allan Whitehead
says...
1:25pm Sat 17 Nov 12
mayall8808
says...
9:11am Mon 19 Nov 12
More Tea Vicar says...
1:21pm Fri 16 Nov 12
It's utter nonsense, and nothing to do with local needs.
If the politicians were so sure it stood up to scrutiny and had popular support, they would have made a better job of the consultation and allowed votes.
Unfortunately, the main parties are united in stupidity when it comes to urban sprawl.
And today's low by-election, with its low turnout, is a good indicator of the low esteem in which politicians and parties are held.