Care on the cheap as Worcestershire council looks to save £125,000 a year (From Malvern Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting MG NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Home care choices cut for severely disabled as Worcestershire council looks to save £125,000 a year
7:30am Friday 9th November 2012 in News By Tom Edwards
Buy this photo »
WORRIED: Anthony Driver is a full-time carer for his fiancée Collette Jackson. (45171701)
DISABLED people fear being forced out of their own homes and into residential care centres due to controversial council spending cuts.
About 2,000 residents with severe disabilities get around-the-clock care in Worcestershire, which includes flexible visits at home and 24-hour support for tasks such as dressing, washing and feeding.
But the county council says the costs are too high and moving severely disabled people into care homes will save it £500,000 over the next four years.
From now on, all new service users will be offered alternatives such as living in care homes or ‘cluster’ flats, with on-call nursing.
The changes will mean that anyone currently receiving the package will be faced with the agonising decision to go into a home if their needs “escalate” and are deemed to be too expensive to maintain at home.
At-home support will be generally avoided unless families can contribute to the costs, or in cases where it is cheaper than a residential care home.
The change was voted through by the county council’s Conservative cabinet yesterday, despite bitter opposition from campaigners.
At the start of the meeting Jacky Payton, co-chair of the Worcestershire Coalition for Independent Living, said: “This has the potential to restrict choice and goes against the ethos of independent living.
“It is difficult to see how it will not force people into residential care.”
The council’s community care package has cost taxpayers £11 million in the last six years alone. It also says 100 current users' needs cost more than £52,000-a-year each, with one disabled person’s bill spiralling to £232,000 in just 12 months.
At-home support is about three times more expensive than placing people into care homes. Worcestershire County Council’s cabinet member for adult social care, Councillor Philip Gretton, said: “The approach will be to compare, on an individual basis, the costs of meeting their needs in a residential setting against the costs of meeting it in the community.
“This will allow a discussion about how their needs could be met in the community in a way that is comparable.
“We won’t ‘force’ people into care homes,” he said.
“People coming into the service with progressively higher needs are not being matched by those who leave it, because happily, people are now living longer.”
Collette Jackson knows all about the daily problems people with disabilities face.
The 47-year-old, of Himbleton Road, St John’s, Worcester, was born with cerebral palsy and also suffers arthritis and spinal problems.
As a recipient of the council’s community care package, she gets help with routine tasks like getting dressed for the day ahead.
“I’m livid,” she said. “My fiance Anthony does the bulk of my support but I also rely on these carers to help me.
“We should be going forwards in society, not backwards. My worry is what could happen if my needs escalate. If I’m forced to go into a home I won’t be independent, will I? Now, I can go outside when I want to go out. I can do what I want, I’ve got freedom.
“This could affect my relationship, and my life. So many disabled people are worried.”
Comments(24)
mayall8808
says...
8:06am Fri 9 Nov 12
Andy-Apache
says...
9:37am Fri 9 Nov 12
stevoe
says...
10:54am Fri 9 Nov 12
140354
says...
11:20am Fri 9 Nov 12
Matthew Jenkins
says...
11:24am Fri 9 Nov 12
dulon
says...
1:45pm Fri 9 Nov 12
Frank13
says...
4:11pm Fri 9 Nov 12
Keith B
says...
4:19pm Fri 9 Nov 12
This 6th richest Country in the world keeps pleading poverty in order to keep the money in the hands of the rich, but the reality is that VOTES are nowadays in the hands of the majority older generation and those of us who are rapidly approaching it - and if the Government and Local Government keeps hitting old people they simply won't be in Government next time around.
We need a GREY Party that looks after what people born after 1945 were promised - "that you pay into the system while you are working through national insurance and we will look after you from cradle to grave".
If they want to change that so that promise is withdrawn from everyone born after (say) 1990, fine; but we have to look after those to whom that promise was made. The fact that successive Governments squandered the National Insurance money the minute it was paid in is simply tough luck. They should have put in savings. Government has a absolute obligation - indeed a contract - to look after it's older population and that doesn't mean stealing their houses and putting them in homes.
Of course in this week of Police Commissioner elections, does this mean the 76 year old Independent candidate will be operating out of a Care Home to handle the near quarter of a billion pound police budget - because sure as hell the Council would like to force him into one!
mod1979
says...
7:19pm Fri 9 Nov 12
pdenham
says...
8:16pm Fri 9 Nov 12
RobertR
says...
10:21pm Fri 9 Nov 12
At least G4S isn't running the care services.
jb
says...
12:38am Sat 10 Nov 12
In my opinion ifmtherenwas a fairer distribution of the funding more people would benefit. It won't mean more people going into care homes just less people hogging the funding.
green49
says...
7:28am Sat 10 Nov 12
green49
says...
7:30am Sat 10 Nov 12
jb
says...
8:13am Sat 10 Nov 12
markcroft1975
says...
10:28am Sat 10 Nov 12
.com/groups/wcc.cap.
socialcare/
Handcart
says...
1:24pm Sat 10 Nov 12
Many private care companies pay staff poorly but charge a lot. If you are managing or helping someone manage a care budget, DO take the time to consider employing carers yourself. Paying less for your care this way can be a way of taking the profit out of care, and that's the real scandal, folks.
Handcart
says...
1:46pm Sat 10 Nov 12
Andy-Apache - the social care budget is not the same as social security. That comes direct from government, sort of, though it is also being cut in ways that affect disabled and disadvantaged people very badly. As well as having a whiff of social engineering, such as deterring poorer people from having so many kids by cutting child benefit to those out of work.
Green49 - Some boses were affected. I think the head of social services has been squeezed out in the merge that brings in Mr Harling. Also the number of departments has been cut so less directors oversall. Problem is, whose doing all the work? Is it getting pushed on down the tree so the front line staff you meet are more pressed than ever?
Omicron
says...
1:53pm Sat 10 Nov 12
WCC want to move disabled people into care homes because it is cheaper yet when it comes to the elderly they want to keep them out of care homes because it is more expensive.
Talk about shooting themselves in the foot.
green49
says...
2:32pm Sat 10 Nov 12
Handcart, some extremely knowedgable bosses were hounded out and Harling put in, he will devastate the lot, he has no background in all the services and he has been in the job months, all that went on this week has not been notified to the service providers or unions etc, it is totally underhand and not fair to people who will be redundant.
This council cannot be trusted.
jb
says...
11:14pm Sat 10 Nov 12
mayall8808
says...
8:17am Sun 11 Nov 12
This government could not careless about anything but money, yes things have to be paid for but so much is wasted in this country and we don't even look after our own, its a disgrace.
Jabbadad
says...
12:30am Mon 12 Nov 12
There are so many who cannot afford the highly priced services, and who would not qualify for special allowances in addition to the normal councilor attendance allowances. So franky there is hardship and then there is hardship, depending whether you can pay or not. And all councilors attendance allowances are posted on the relevant web sites, they make interesting reading.
Jabbadad
says...
12:35am Mon 12 Nov 12
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with